Jung and apophatic discourse

There is a growing preoccupation among psychoanalytic writers with unknowing and the unknowable. The works of Goudsmit, Anderson, Grotstein, Merkur, Eigen, Schlamm, Tacey, Dourley and Henderson, among others, explore the interface of psychoanalysis and apophasis. Frank asserts that, “all ‘psychology’ which really sees its object and really takes account of its peculiar character must be ‘negative psychology’ (by analogy to negative theology).” This trend within psychoanalysis can be seen as part of a wider interest across disciplines, which Caputo has characterised as ‘generalized apophatics.’
It can be argued that Jung’s work is saturated with apophasis. As such it has a place within this ‘generalized apophatics.’ This provides an additional way of contextualising analytical psychology within the contemporary intellectual landscape. The coincidence of opposites, the nature of symbols, the transcendent function and individuation are aspects of Jungian theory that can be characterised as apophatic discourse.