Semantic representation and ease of predication
Article
De Mornay Davies, P. and Funnell, E. 2000. Semantic representation and ease of predication. Brain and Language. 73 (1), pp. 92-119. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2299
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Semantic representation and ease of predication |
Authors | De Mornay Davies, P. and Funnell, E. |
Abstract | Jones'(1985) Ease of Predication hypothesis, which states that underlying differences in the semantic representation of concrete and abstract words can be explained in terms of disproportionate numbers of semantic predicates, is explored in two experiments. The results suggest that (1) the advantage shown by concrete words in terms of greater number of predicates is only apparent for words of low frequency, and (2) Jones' ease of predication variable does not accurately reflect predicate distributions, or differences in imageability. Rather, it appears to represent differences in concreteness. As such, the validity of this concept as the basis of theories of semantic representation is questioned. Models based on the assumption of a “richer” semantic representation for concrete words are therefore not supported. |
Research Group | Language, Learning and Cognition group |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Journal | Brain and Language |
ISSN | 0093-934X |
Publication dates | |
Jun 2000 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 30 Oct 2009 |
Output status | Published |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2299 |
Language | English |
File |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/81x57
Download files
45
total views14
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month