Professional identity in nursing: UK students' explanations for poor standards of care
Article
Traynor, M. and Buus, N. 2016. Professional identity in nursing: UK students' explanations for poor standards of care. Social Science & Medicine. 166, pp. 186-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.024
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Professional identity in nursing: UK students' explanations for poor standards of care |
Authors | Traynor, M. and Buus, N. |
Abstract | Research concludes that professional socialisation in nursing is deeply problematic because new recruits start out identifying with the profession’s ideals but lose this idealism as they enter and continue to work in the profession. This study set out to examine the topic focussing on the development of professional identity. Six focus groups were held with a total of 49 2nd and 3rd year BSc nursing students studying at a university in London, UK and their transcripts were subject to discourse analysis. Participants’ talk was strongly dualistic and inflected with anxiety. Participants identified with caring as an innate characteristic. They described some qualified nurses as either not possessing this characteristic or as having lost it. They explained strategies for not becoming corrupted in professional practice. Their talk enacted distancing from ‘bad’ qualified nurses and solidarity with other students. Their talk also featured cynicism. Neophyte nurses’ talk of idealism and cynicism can be understood as identity work in the context of anxiety inherent in the work of nurses and in a relatively powerless position in the professional healthcare hierarchy. |
Keywords | United Kingdom; Nurses; Anxiety; Care and compassion; Discourse analysis; Focus groups; Professional identity |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Journal | Social Science & Medicine |
ISSN | 0277-9536 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 18 Aug 2016 |
01 Oct 2016 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 23 Sep 2016 |
Accepted | 16 Aug 2016 |
Output status | Published |
Accepted author manuscript | License |
Copyright Statement | © 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Additional information | Available online 18 August 2016 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.024 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/86983
Download files
Accepted author manuscript
18
total views50
total downloads1
views this month7
downloads this month