Darfur and the ‘odious scourge’: the Commission of Inquiry's findings on genocide
Article
Schabas, W. 2005. Darfur and the ‘odious scourge’: the Commission of Inquiry's findings on genocide. Leiden Journal of International Law. 18 (4), pp. 871-885. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156505003031
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Darfur and the ‘odious scourge’: the Commission of Inquiry's findings on genocide |
Authors | Schabas, W. |
Abstract | The report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur, set up pursuant to a UN Security Council resolution, is an important contribution to the evolving law of genocide. The Commission concluded that genocide had not been committed, but that the case should be referred to the International Criminal Court for prosecution as crimes against humanity and war crimes. The Commission did not find significant evidence of genocidal intent. It looked essentially for a plan or policy of the Sudanese state and, in its absence, concluded that genocide was not being committed. The Commission endorsed the ‘stable and permanent groups’ approach taken by one trial chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). On this point, it exaggerated the acceptance of this interpretation, which has been ignored by other trial chambers of the international tribunals. However, the Commission found that the better approach to determination of the groups covered by the Convention is subjective, and that the targeted tribes in Darfur meet this criterion. |
Research Group | Law and Politics |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law | |
Journal | Leiden Journal of International Law |
ISSN | 0922-1565 |
Publication dates | |
2005 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 19 Apr 2011 |
Output status | Published |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156505003031 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/834v7
83
total views0
total downloads7
views this month0
downloads this month