Options in tourism development: conscious versus conventional tourism
Article
Andriotis, K. 2002. Options in tourism development: conscious versus conventional tourism. Anatolia. 13 (1), pp. 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2002.9687016
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Options in tourism development: conscious versus conventional tourism |
Authors | Andriotis, K. |
Abstract | Development by its nature is a process of change that may be implemented in a variety of ways. As a result, tourist receiving destinations have a variety of options to follow in developing their tourism industry. These options concern mainly the process and/or funding of development, and include the following dichotomous alternatives: capital versus labour intensive; endogenous versus exogenous; small scale versus large; alternative versus mass and enclave versus spread out. It is the aim of this paper to discuss the five alternatives by undertaking a literature review to investigate the benefits and costs associated with each of them and providing guidelines for destination tourism development. From the review it is evident the possibility of categorising the five development options into two distinctive groups, namely conscious and conventional tourism. Each group presents differences to its impacts to a tourist receiving destination, the ownership/control patterns of the industry and the numbers of facilities and tourists. |
Keywords | development options, conventional versus conscious tourism |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Journal | Anatolia |
ISSN | 1303-2917 |
Publication dates | |
2002 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 02 May 2014 |
Output status | Published |
Accepted author manuscript | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2002.9687016 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/84v0y
Download files
Accepted author manuscript
63
total views24
total downloads6
views this month1
downloads this month