Multinational evaluation of the measurement invariance of the level of personality functioning scale–brief form 2.0: comparison of student and community samples across seven countries
Article
Natoli, A., Bach, B., Behn, A., Cottin, M., Gritti, E., Hutsebaut, J., Lamba, N., Le Corff, Y., Zimmerman, J. and Lapalme, M. 2022. Multinational evaluation of the measurement invariance of the level of personality functioning scale–brief form 2.0: comparison of student and community samples across seven countries. Psychological Assessment. 34 (12), pp. 1112-1125. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001176
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Multinational evaluation of the measurement invariance of the level of personality functioning scale–brief form 2.0: comparison of student and community samples across seven countries |
Authors | Natoli, A., Bach, B., Behn, A., Cottin, M., Gritti, E., Hutsebaut, J., Lamba, N., Le Corff, Y., Zimmerman, J. and Lapalme, M. |
Abstract | DSM-5’s Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) was introduced as a dimensional rating of impairments in self- and interpersonal functioning, and the LPFS – Brief Form (LPFS-BF) was the first published corresponding self-report. The updated LPFS-BF 2.0 has been translated into several languages and international research supports many of the instrument’s psychometric properties; however, its measurement invariance has only been evaluated across a few countries. This study expands previous studies as an introductory step in a global evaluation of the LPFS-BF 2.0’s measurement invariance. Archival data (N = 5,618, 57% female) from seven countries (Canada, Chile, Denmark, Germany, Italy, United Arab Emirates, United States of America) were used for this study. Participants were recruited from both community (n = 4,677) and student (n = 941) populations. After confirming adequate model fit separately in the community and student samples, we evaluated a series of increasingly stringent model comparisons to test three aspects of measurement invariance (configural, metric, scalar) and then examined latent mean differences across countries. Full scalar invariance was supported in the community sample and partial scalar invariance was supported in the student sample. Evaluation of latent mean differences revealed multiple significant differences. Overall, the LPFS-BF 2.0 appears to assess self- and interpersonal functioning impairment similarly across the included countries. Findings are discussed through the lenses of the cultures from which participants were recruited, as well as in the context of alternative explanations. Limitations, plans for future research, and implications for both research and clinical practice are offered. |
Keywords | personality functioning; alternative model for personality disorders; culture; international; measurement invariance |
Middlesex University Theme | Health & Wellbeing |
Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) |
Journal | Psychological Assessment |
ISSN | 1040-3590 |
Electronic | 1040-3590 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 15 Sep 2022 |
Dec 2022 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 14 Sep 2022 |
Submitted | 05 Jan 2022 |
Accepted | 09 Aug 2022 |
Output status | Published |
Accepted author manuscript | File Access Level Open |
Copyright Statement | ©American Psychological Association, 2022. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article is available, upon publication, at: DOI: 10.1037/pas0001176 URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pas0001176 |
Web address (URL) | https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pas0001176 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001176 |
Web of Science identifier | WOS:000853570300001 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/89z9z
Download files
Accepted author manuscript
Multinational comparison of the LPFS_FINAL to share.pdf | ||
File access level: Open |
79
total views72
total downloads4
views this month3
downloads this month