Research on the experience of staff with disabilities within the NHS workforce

Project report


Ryan, P., Edwards, M., Hafford-Letchfield, T., Bell, L., Carr, S., Puniskis, M., Hanna, S., Jeewa, S., NHS England, Middlesex University and University of Bedfordshire 2016. Research on the experience of staff with disabilities within the NHS workforce. London UK Middlesex University.
TypeProject report
TitleResearch on the experience of staff with disabilities within the NHS workforce
AuthorsRyan, P., Edwards, M., Hafford-Letchfield, T., Bell, L., Carr, S., Puniskis, M., Hanna, S., Jeewa, S., NHS England, Middlesex University and University of Bedfordshire
EditorsRyan, P., Edwards, M., Hafford-Letchfield, T. and Bell, L.
Abstract

NHS England has commissioned a primarily quantitative research project, focusing on the experiences of staff with disabilities working within the NHS, drawing upon two national data sets:
• The 2014 NHS staff survey, completed by 255,000 staff, reporting their experiences of working in the NHS
• The Electronic Staff Record (ESR), comprising data on the entire NHS workforce, gathered for workforce planning, personnel and wage payment purposes.
The research tender required a focus on the following issues:
a. What is staff with disabilities’ representation at all levels of the NHS and covering different types of disability?
b. Why is there a disparity between the proportion of staff who declare a disability on the Electronic Staff Record System and of those who declare a disability on the anonymous NHS staff survey?
c. How well are staff supported who become disabled during the course of their employment? Is there a process for recording this on the staff survey?
d. What are appraisal rates for staff with disabilities compared to non-disabled staff?
e. Do staff with disabilities have similar levels of access to training and development as non-disabled staff?
f. How well do NHS organisations make reasonable adjustments for staff with disabilities, from the recruitment process to the end of employment?
g. What difference does the ‘two ticks’ symbol make to recruitment and employment?
h. What are the numbers of staff with disabilities who are the subject of employment processes and procedures, for example disciplinary and capability processes?
i. What are the turn-over, retention and stability rates for staff with disabilities within the NHS?
Key findings are:
Staff with disabilities’ representation at all levels of the NHS and covering different types of disability
Levels of reported disability are around 17% in the NHS Staff survey, and around 3% in the ESR. Neither data set allows for more specific analysis between different types or degrees of disability. The most likely reasons for the disparity between reported levels of disability are:
1. Differences in definition of disability used in the two data sets
2. Differing conditions for self-disclosure (NHS staff survey is anonymous)
3. Time of disclosure (ESR reports disability at the time of staff appointment, and is not reliably updated)
Differences in quality of support between staff with and without disabilities
There was not a specific survey question that addressed this issue, but it was possible to identify a number of questions that the report argues can be taken as acting as ‘indicators’: What are the levels of bullying and harassment?; How far do staff feel ‘Pressure to work when feeling unwell’?; Do staff feel their organisation acts fairly with regard to career progression? Relative to non-disabled staff, staff with disabilities felt more bullied, in particular from their managers (12 percentage points more); more pressure to work when feeling unwell (11 percentage points more); and less confident that their organisation acts fairly with regard to career progression (8 points difference). The report concludes that, relative to non-disabled staff, staff with disabilities rate themselves as substantially less well supported.
Appraisal rates
Rates of appraisal between staff with and without disabilities were broadly comparable. However there were substantial differences in how the value of appraisal was rated. Staff with disabilities are less satisfied with the effects of their appraisal. 7 percentage points fewer felt that appraisals improved their performance. Moreover, 9 percentage points more disabled staff report that their appraisal left them feeling that their work is not valued by their organisation.
Experience of training
The NHS staff survey indicates that most staff had training within the last 12 months and only 5 - 25% staff received no training in each specified topic. There is very little disparity between disabled and non-disabled staff in the proportion not receiving training in any of the topics, or in their satisfaction with the training.
Reasonable adjustments
The NHS Staff survey asks if ‘employer has made adequate adjustment(s) to enable you to carry on your work’. 40% respond ‘Yes’, 14% ‘No’ and 46% ‘No adjustment required’. The proportion responding ‘No’ varies substantially depending on the Trust involved, from a low of 5% to a high of 41%. The proportion also varies by ethnicity, with white British staff with disabilities expressing the lowest rate of dissatisfaction with the adjustments their employer made, while all other ethnic categories have consistently higher rates. The relatively small groups of Bangladeshi and ‘Other black background’ staff have the highest rates of dissatisfaction.
Job satisfaction
Staff with disabilities rate themselves as more dissatisfied with the recognition, support, responsibility and opportunities they have in their jobs, even though there is no difference in the satisfaction they report in the quality of care they give to patients. Staff with disabilities felt less recognised for their good work undertaken (8 percentage points fewer); they felt less supported by their immediate managers (5 percentage points fewer); they felt less supported by their work colleagues (3 percentage points fewer); they were more dissatisfied with the levels of responsibility they had been given (4 percentage points fewer); they felt they had less opportunity to use their skills (5 percentage points fewer); and finally, they were substantially less satisfied with their level of remuneration, and they thought they were valued less highly by their organisation for the contribution they were making (both 9 percentage points fewer).
What difference does the ‘two ticks’ symbol make to recruitment and employment?
The evidence from previous studies suggests that the Two Ticks award does not make a great deal of difference in terms of an organisation’s awareness of disability issues or in its capacity to address any inequalities or inadequacies in practice. We found in our study that the great majority of Trusts now have ‘Two Tick’ status. Using the NHS Jobs website, Trust websites and other evidence available online, as well as a DWP list, an estimate was made of the current ‘Two Ticks’ status of every Trust. 18 of 244 (7%) Trusts were found to not have the award. A comparison was made between Trusts with and without the ‘Two Ticks’ award of the extent to which staff who declare a disability report that their employer failed to make ‘adequate adjustments’ to enable them to carry out their work. Although in our study, there was a consistent finding that Trusts that have the ‘Two Ticks’ award have marginally higher average rates of ‘adequate adjustments’ reported by staff with disabilities, the difference is small, the number of ‘No award’ Trusts is small (just 1 in the case of Ambulance and Community Trusts) and the range among all Trusts is very large (from 5% to 41 %). Given also that the overall performance of Trusts was poor with respect to a variety of issues summarized above, such as levels of bullying and harassment, impact of appraisal etc., it would seem that ‘Two Ticks’ status achieves relatively little in terms of improved performance against these metrics.

KeywordsNHS staff survey; Disability; disabled staff; NHS Workforce; NHS Disability Equality Standard
PublisherMiddlesex University
Place of publicationLondon UK
Publication dates
Print06 Jan 2016
Publication process dates
Deposited12 Jan 2016
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
Copyright Statement

Public access agreed with NHS England; links to NHS England website to be added later when these identified by NHS England

LanguageEnglish
Institution nameMiddlesex University and University of Bedfordshire
Department nameSchool of Health and Education
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/86196

Download files


Publisher's version
  • 68
    total views
  • 13
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Developing a novel programme for transition to nursing and graduate study at Middlesex University London using accreditation of prior learning
Sobrany, S., Corbett, K., Taylor, M. and Middlesex University 2015. Developing a novel programme for transition to nursing and graduate study at Middlesex University London using accreditation of prior learning. Chief Nursing Officer’s Black and Minority Ethnic Advisory Group 7th Annual Conference Valuing Diversity - Embracing Change. Birmingham City Football Ground, St. Andrews Stadium, Cattell Rd, Birmingham, West Midlands B9 4RL Hosted by Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust 16 Oct 2015
Delivering alcohol IBA: broadening the base from health to non-health contexts: review of the literature and scoping
Thom, B., Herring, R., Luger, L., Annand, F., Alcohol Research UK and Middlesex University 2014. Delivering alcohol IBA: broadening the base from health to non-health contexts: review of the literature and scoping. London Alcohol Research UK.
Pedagogical beliefs in work based learning: an analysis and implications of teachers’ belief orientations
Abukari, A. and Middlesex University 2014. Pedagogical beliefs in work based learning: an analysis and implications of teachers’ belief orientations. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 19 (4), pp. 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2014.955644
Evaluation of the pilot of Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Kelly, L., Adler, J., Horvath, M., Lovett, J., Coulson, M., Kernohan, D., Gray, M., London Metropolitan University, Middlesex University and Home Office Science 2013. Evaluation of the pilot of Domestic Violence Protection Orders. London, UK Home Office.
An energy-efficient routing protocol using movement trends in vehicular ad hoc networks
Zhang, D., Yang, Z., Raychoudhury, V., Chen, Z., LIoret, J., Tongji University, Middlesex University, Indian Institute of Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Polytechnic University of Valencia 2013. An energy-efficient routing protocol using movement trends in vehicular ad hoc networks. The Computer Journal. 56 (8), pp. 938-946. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxt028
Government size, institutions, and export performance among OECD economies
Bournakis, I., Tsoukis, C., Middlesex University and London Metropolitan University 2013. Government size, institutions, and export performance among OECD economies. Middlesex University.
A positive choice: young people who drink little or no alcohol
Herring, R., Bayley, M., Hurcombe, R., Middlesex University and Joseph Rowntree Foundation 2012. A positive choice: young people who drink little or no alcohol. York Jospeh Rowntree Foundation.
Exploiting location and contextual information to develop a comprehensive framework for proactive handover in heterogeneous environments
Mapp, G., Katsriku, F., Aiash, M., Chinnam, N., Lopes, R., Moreira, E., Vanni, R., Augusto, M., Middlesex University and University of Sao Paulo 2012. Exploiting location and contextual information to develop a comprehensive framework for proactive handover in heterogeneous environments. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/748163
Stream bundle management layer for optimum management of co-existing telemedicine traffic streams under varying channel conditions in heterogeneous networks.
Shaikh, F., Lasebae, A., Mapp, G. and Middlesex University 2005. Stream bundle management layer for optimum management of co-existing telemedicine traffic streams under varying channel conditions in heterogeneous networks. MIT 2005. China
Proactive policy management for heterogeneous networks
Shaikh, F., Lasebae, A., Mapp, G. and Middlesex University 2008. Proactive policy management for heterogeneous networks. 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: from Theory to Applications (ICTTA 2008). Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 07 - 11 Apr 2008
Client-based SBM layer for predictive management of traffic flows in heterogeneous networks
Shaikh, F., Lasebae, A., Mapp, G. and Middlesex University 2006. Client-based SBM layer for predictive management of traffic flows in heterogeneous networks. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: from Theory to Applications (ICTTA 2006). Damascus, Syria 24 - 28 Apr 2006
Traffic modelling in WLANs and cellular networks.
Gemikonakli, E., Mapp, G., Gemikonakli, O., Ever, E. and Middlesex University 2011. Traffic modelling in WLANs and cellular networks. First Global Conference on Communication, Science and Information Engineering (CCSIE 2011). Middlesex University 25 - 27 Jul 2011
A survey of network coverage prediction mechanisms in 4G heterogeneous wireless networks.
Shaikh, F., Mapp, G., Lasebae, A., British Institute of Technology and e-Commerce and Middlesex University 2011. A survey of network coverage prediction mechanisms in 4G heterogeneous wireless networks. First Global Conference on Communication, Science and Information Engineering (CCSIE 2011). Middlesex University 25 - 27 Jul 2011
Exploring the concept of scope to provide better security for internet services.
Aiash, M., Mapp, G., Lasebae, A., Phan, R., Middlesex University and Loughborough University 2011. Exploring the concept of scope to provide better security for internet services. First Global Conference on Communication, Science and Engineering (CCSIE 2011). Middlesex University 25 - 27 Jul 2011
The development of a dynamic and robust event-based routing protocol in wireless sensor networks for environment monitoring.
Rantisi, M., Maquosi, A., Mapp, G., Gemikonakli, O., PSUT University, Petra University and Middlesex University 2011. The development of a dynamic and robust event-based routing protocol in wireless sensor networks for environment monitoring. First Global Conference on Communication, Science and Information Engineering (CCSIE 2011). Middlesex University 25 - 27 Jul 2011
Enhancing naming and location services to support multi-homed devices in heterogeneous environments
Aiash, M., Mapp, G., Lasebae, A., Phan, R., Augusto, M., Vanni, R., Moreira, E., Middlesex University, Loughborough University and University of Sao Paulo 2011. Enhancing naming and location services to support multi-homed devices in heterogeneous environments. First Conference on Communication, Science and Information Enginneering (CCSIE 2011). Middlesex University 25 - 27 Jul 2011
Proactive policy management using TBVH mechanism in heterogeneous networks.
Shaikh, F., Mapp, G., Lasebae, A. and Middlesex University 2007. Proactive policy management using TBVH mechanism in heterogeneous networks. Proceedings of the International Conference and Exhibition on 'Next Generation Mobile Application, Services and Technologies' (NGMAST 2007). Cardiff, Wales 12 - 14 Sep 2007
Endocul: endometriosis and cultural diversity: improving services for minority ethnic women.
Denny, E., Culley, L., Mann, C., Papadopoulos, R., Apenteng, P., De Montfort University, Middlesex University and Birmingham City University 2010. Endocul: endometriosis and cultural diversity: improving services for minority ethnic women. NHS.
Balancing streaming and demand accesses in a network based storage environment.
Thakker, D., Mapp, G., Gemikonakli, O. and Middlesex University 2010. Balancing streaming and demand accesses in a network based storage environment. in: Sobh, T., Elleithy, K. and Mahmood, A. (ed.) Novel algorithms and techniques in telecommunications and networking. London, New York Springer. pp. 403-408
Exploring multi-homing issues in heterogeneous networks
Mapp, G., Aiash, M., Guardia, H., Crowcroft, J., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Middlesex University, Federal University of Sao Paulo and University of Cambridge 2011. Exploring multi-homing issues in heterogeneous networks. IEEE. pp. 690-695 https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2011.140
Y-Comm research [web page]
Mapp, G., Middlesex University, University of Cambridge, University of Sao Paulo and Loughborough University 2008. Y-Comm research [web page]. Middlesex University.
Exploring gate-limited analytical models for high-performance network storage servers
Mapp, G., Thakker, D., Gemikonakli, O. and Middlesex University 2011. Exploring gate-limited analytical models for high-performance network storage servers. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 77 (5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2010.08.002
Providing security in 4G systems: unveiling the challenges
Aiash, M., Mapp, G., Lasebae, A., Phan, R., Middlesex University and Loughborough University 2010. Providing security in 4G systems: unveiling the challenges. Atmaca, T., Palicot, J., Amor, N., Tsiatsos, T., Marot, M. and Dini, O. (ed.) IEEE. pp. 439-444 https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT.2010.24
An analytical approach for performance analysis of handoffs in the next generation integrated cellular networks and WLANs
Kirsal, Y., Gemikonakli, E., Ever, E., Mapp, G., Gemikonakli, O. and Middlesex University 2010. An analytical approach for performance analysis of handoffs in the next generation integrated cellular networks and WLANs. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2010.5560093
Information for handover management in heterogeneous networks: data representation,languages and integrated platforms
Vanni, R., Branco, K., Moreira, E., Mapp, G., University of Sao Paulo and Middlesex University 2010. Information for handover management in heterogeneous networks: data representation,languages and integrated platforms. 7th International Conference on Information and Technology Management. Sao Paulo, Brazil 19 - 21 May 2010
Would you give art to a drowning man?
Alves, M., Arends, B., Rodriguez, F., Fisher, J., Read, S. and Middlesex University 2008. Would you give art to a drowning man? "Would you give art to a drowning man?". London, UK 26 Sep 2008