The right to freedom of religion or belief and its intersection with other rights

Discussion paper


Donald, A., Howard, E. and ILGA-Europe 2015. The right to freedom of religion or belief and its intersection with other rights. Brussels, Belgium ILGA-Europe.
TypeDiscussion paper
TitleThe right to freedom of religion or belief and its intersection with other rights
AuthorsDonald, A., Howard, E. and ILGA-Europe
Abstract

This paper was commissioned by ILGA-Europe, to examine how the right to freedom of religion or belief intersects with other human rights, including the rights to freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, and to be protected from discrimination and hate speech. The paper examines in particular the tension between religious freedom and the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people, which is a matter of controversy in both legal and political discourse in Europe and elsewhere. In particular, some Christian organisations and commentators have portrayed anti-discrimination law as conflicting directly with the right to freedom of religion or belief. Such arguments are increasingly couched in terms of the asserted ‘right’ of religious individuals conscientiously to opt out of providing goods or services to same-sex couples or to express views that might be considered by others to be homophobic or transphobic. This discourse has gone so far as to characterise the scope and application of equality law as a form of religious persecution. The aim of this paper is to assist ILGA-Europe and other interested parties to respond to such arguments in a manner which is consistent with the standards and principles enshrined in both human rights and equality law, as articulated in the European Convention on Human Rights, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and relevant United Nations treaties and declarations, and authoritative interpretations of these instruments by the relevant courts and treaty bodies.

Keywordshuman rights, law, intersectionality, LGBT, religion, belief, discrimination, sexual orientation
Research GroupLaw and Politics
PublisherILGA-Europe
Place of publicationBrussels, Belgium
Publication dates
PrintJan 2015
Publication process dates
Deposited14 Apr 2016
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
Additional information

A research paper for ILGA-Europe

Web address (URL)http://www.ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/Attachments/the_right_to_freedom_of_religion_or_belief_and_its_intersection_with_other_rights__0.pdf
LanguageEnglish
Institution nameMiddlesex University
Department nameLaw and Politics
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/863vz

  • 119
    total views
  • 53
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Explainer: Leaving the European Convention on Human Rights
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2024. Explainer: Leaving the European Convention on Human Rights. UK in a Changing Europe.
Religious discrimination at the CJEU and the social inclusion approach
Howard, E. 2024. Religious discrimination at the CJEU and the social inclusion approach. European Labour Law Journal .
Explainer: The UK’s ECHR record: how common are Rule 39 orders and how often is the UK found to have violated rights?
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2024. Explainer: The UK’s ECHR record: how common are Rule 39 orders and how often is the UK found to have violated rights? UK in a Changing Europe.
OP v Commune d'Ans: another step in the wrong direction for headscarf wearing women
Howard, E. 2024. OP v Commune d'Ans: another step in the wrong direction for headscarf wearing women. Industrial Law Journal. 53 (2), p. 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwae008
Op-Ed: The Court of Justice and headscarves at work: discretion in EU anti-discrimination law: a dangerous precedent (Case C-148/22 OP v Commune d’Ans)
Howard, E. 2023. Op-Ed: The Court of Justice and headscarves at work: discretion in EU anti-discrimination law: a dangerous precedent (Case C-148/22 OP v Commune d’Ans). EU Law Live Sociedad Limitada.
Earning deference from Strasbourg: Has the UK got the message?
Donald, A. 2022. Earning deference from Strasbourg: Has the UK got the message? The Human Rights Act After 22 Years: Evolution, Impact, Future Directions. Goodenough College, London, WC1N 2AB 03 - 04 Nov 2022
Rule of law in peril? Checking states’ misuse of power–implications and consequences of article 18 violations
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2022. Rule of law in peril? Checking states’ misuse of power–implications and consequences of article 18 violations. in: Liber Amicorum Robert Spano Strasbourg Council of Europe. pp. 401-413
Defeat in the Supreme Court: where next for UK asylum policy?
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Defeat in the Supreme Court: where next for UK asylum policy? Verfassungsblog.
Explainer: What are the Rwanda Treaty and the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill?
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Explainer: What are the Rwanda Treaty and the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill? UK in a Changing Europe.
Explainer: The Illegal Migration Act 2023
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Explainer: The Illegal Migration Act 2023. UK in a Changing Europe.
LF v SCRL and the CJEU’s failure to engage with the reality of Muslim women in the labour market
Howard, E. 2023. LF v SCRL and the CJEU’s failure to engage with the reality of Muslim women in the labour market. Industrial Law Journal. 52 (4), pp. 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwad024
Headscarves and the Court of Justice of the European Union: an analysis of the case law
Howard, E. 2023. Headscarves and the Court of Justice of the European Union: an analysis of the case law. London Routledge.
Explainer: Compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights: the UK and Europe
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Explainer: Compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights: the UK and Europe. UK in a Changing Europe.
Explainer: The Illegal Migration Bill
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Explainer: The Illegal Migration Bill. UK in a Changing Europe.
The UK vs the ECtHR: Anatomy of a politically engineered collision course
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2023. The UK vs the ECtHR: Anatomy of a politically engineered collision course. Verfassungsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20230505-204527-0
Responding to seismic change in Europe—The road to Reykjavik and beyond
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2023. Responding to seismic change in Europe—The road to Reykjavik and beyond. European Human Rights Law Review. 2023 (2), pp. 95-111.
Adapt or Die? The Council of Europe seeks new ideas to address ‘seismic change’
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2023. Adapt or Die? The Council of Europe seeks new ideas to address ‘seismic change’. Verfassungsblog.
Op-Ed: Encouraging tolerance and respect and accepting a greater degree of diversity … but not for Muslim women (Case C344/20 LF v SCRL)
Howard, E. 2022. Op-Ed: Encouraging tolerance and respect and accepting a greater degree of diversity … but not for Muslim women (Case C344/20 LF v SCRL). EU Law Live Sociedad Limitada.
Explainer: the Bill of Rights Bill
Donald, A. 2022. Explainer: the Bill of Rights Bill. ukandeu.ac.uk.
Why the Bill of Rights poses problems for human rights in Europe – and the UK’s international standing
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2022. Why the Bill of Rights poses problems for human rights in Europe – and the UK’s international standing. ukandeu.ac.uk.
Equality as an EU value
Howard, E. 2022. Equality as an EU value. in: Garben, S. and Gormley, L. (ed.) Oxford Encyclopedia of EU Law Oxford Oxford University Press (OUP).
Bans on the wearing of Burqas, Niqabs and Hijabs, religious freedom and the secular nature of the state
Howard, E. 2022. Bans on the wearing of Burqas, Niqabs and Hijabs, religious freedom and the secular nature of the state. in: Bhuiyan, M. and Black, A. (ed.) Religious Freedom in Secular States: A 21st Century Perspective Leiden, The Netherlands Brill | Nijhoff.
Human Rights - the essential frame of reference in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2022. Human Rights - the essential frame of reference in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. in: Grogan, J. and Donald, A. (ed.) Routledge Handbook on Law and the COVID-19 pandemic Abingdon, Oxon Routledge. pp. 101-116
Public health is not the only measure of success. The ‘health’ of democratic institutions matters too
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2022. Public health is not the only measure of success. The ‘health’ of democratic institutions matters too. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Policy paper on the implications of COVID-19: Insights into state governance and the rule of law, human rights and good governance during the COVID-19 pandemic
Grogan, J. and Donald, A. 2022. Policy paper on the implications of COVID-19: Insights into state governance and the rule of law, human rights and good governance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Leuven European Commission.
Lessons for a 'post-pandemic' future
Grogan, J. and Donald, A. 2022. Lessons for a 'post-pandemic' future. in: Grogan, J. and Donald, A. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Law and the COVID-19 Pandemic Abingdon, Oxon Routledge. pp. 473-484
Headscarves and the CJEU: protecting fundamental rights and pandering to prejudice: the CJEU does both
Howard, E. 2022. Headscarves and the CJEU: protecting fundamental rights and pandering to prejudice: the CJEU does both. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 29 (2), pp. 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X221080557
Hate speech
Howard, E. 2022. Hate speech. in: Binder, C., Nowak, M., Hofbauer, J. and Janig, P. (ed.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights Cheltenham, UK Edward Elgar.
Compliance in the UK in the ‘age of subsidiarity’
Donald, A. 2021. Compliance in the UK in the ‘age of subsidiarity’. in: Grote, R., Morales Antoniazzi, M. and Paris, D. (ed.) Research Handbook on Compliance in International Human Rights Law Edward Elgar.
Religious clothing
Howard, E. 2022. Religious clothing. in: Binder, C., Nowak, M., Hofbauer, J. and Janig, P. (ed.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Huamn Rights Cheltenham, UK Edward Elgar.
Headscarf-wearing employees and the CJEU: what employers can and cannot do
Howard, E. 2021. Headscarf-wearing employees and the CJEU: what employers can and cannot do. ERA Forum. 22 (4), pp. 687-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-021-00689-z
Time for the gloves to come off?: The response by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe to rule of law backsliding
Donald, A. and Speck, A. 2021. Time for the gloves to come off?: The response by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe to rule of law backsliding. European Convention on Human Rights Law Review. 2 (2), pp. 241-273. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10025
German headscarf cases at the ECJ: a glimmer of hope? [Blog post]
Howard, E. 2021. German headscarf cases at the ECJ: a glimmer of hope? [Blog post]. European Law Blog European Law Blog.
Principled resistance to ECtHR Judgments – A New Paradigm?, edited by Marten Breuer [Book review]
Donald, A. 2020. Principled resistance to ECtHR Judgments – A New Paradigm?, edited by Marten Breuer [Book review]. European Convention on Human Rights Law Review. 1 (2), pp. 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-00102003
Freedom of religion or belief and the wearing of religious symbols
Howard, E. 2020. Freedom of religion or belief and the wearing of religious symbols. in: Portaru, A. (ed.) A precious asset? Analyzing religious freedom protections in Europe Vienna, Austria Kairos Publications. pp. 69-98
Human dignity principle in the United Kingdom
Howard, E. 2020. Human dignity principle in the United Kingdom. Global Human Dignity Project.
Headscarves and the CJEU: protecting fundamental rights or pandering to prejudice
Howard, E. 2021. Headscarves and the CJEU: protecting fundamental rights or pandering to prejudice. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 28 (5), pp. 648-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211028427
Engaging with Europe after Brexit: Time to reset the UK’s relationship with the Council of Europe
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2020. Engaging with Europe after Brexit: Time to reset the UK’s relationship with the Council of Europe. London, UK Foreign Policy Centre.
Introduction
Dominguez-Redondo, E. and Howard, E. 2020. Introduction. in: Howard, E., Dominguez-Redondo, E. and Baéz, N. (ed.) Affirmative Action and the Law: Efficacy of National and International Approaches London / New York Routledge. pp. 3-12
Identifying and assessing the implementation of human rights decisions
Donald, A., Long, D. and Speck, A. 2020. Identifying and assessing the implementation of human rights decisions. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 12 (1), pp. 125-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa003
The dynamics of domestic human rights implementation: lessons from qualitative research in Europe
Donald, A. and Speck, A. 2020. The dynamics of domestic human rights implementation: lessons from qualitative research in Europe. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 12 (1), pp. 48-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa007
Achieving substantive equality: mainstreaming duties to complement affirmative action measures
Howard, E. 2020. Achieving substantive equality: mainstreaming duties to complement affirmative action measures. in: Howard, E., Dominguez-Redondo, E. and Beaz, N. (ed.) Affirmative Action and the Law: Efficacy of National and International Approaches London / New York Routledge. pp. 198-212
Effectiveness of affirmative action measures in the United Kingdom and South Africa
Howard, E. 2020. Effectiveness of affirmative action measures in the United Kingdom and South Africa. in: Howard, E., Dominguez-Redondo, E. and Baéz, N. (ed.) Affirmative Action and the Law: Efficacy of National and International Approaches London / New York Routledge. pp. 58-77
Headscarves return to the CJEU: unfinished business
Howard, E. 2020. Headscarves return to the CJEU: unfinished business. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 27 (1), pp. 10-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19889247
Law and the wearing of religious symbols in Europe
Howard, E. 2019. Law and the wearing of religious symbols in Europe. Abingdon/New York Routledge.
Political rhetoric, freedom of expression and hate speech against religious believers
Howard, E. 2020. Political rhetoric, freedom of expression and hate speech against religious believers. in: Vidmar, J. (ed.) European populism and human rights Leiden, The Netherlands Brill | Nijhoff. pp. 193-214
Ritual slaughter and religious freedom
Howard, E. 2019. Ritual slaughter and religious freedom. Common Market Law Review. 56 (3), pp. 803-824.
The European Court of Human Rights’ remedial practice and its impact on the execution of judgments
Donald, A. and Speck, A. 2019. The European Court of Human Rights’ remedial practice and its impact on the execution of judgments. Human Rights Law Review. 19 (1), pp. 83-117. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy043
National parliaments as guarantors of human rights in Europe: handbook for parliamentarians
Donald, A. and Speck, A. 2018. National parliaments as guarantors of human rights in Europe: handbook for parliamentarians. Strasbourg Council of Europe.
Andras Koltay The Troubled Relationship Between Religions and the State Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Religion [Book review]
Howard, E. 2018. Andras Koltay The Troubled Relationship Between Religions and the State Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Religion [Book review]. Human Rights Law Review. 18 (4), pp. 791-795. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy031
Moving hate speech to the civil courts
Howard, E. 2018. Moving hate speech to the civil courts. Anti-Discrimination Law Review. 1 (3), pp. 80-97.
EU anti-discrimination law: has the CJEU stopped moving forward?
Howard, E. 2018. EU anti-discrimination law: has the CJEU stopped moving forward? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 18 (2-3), pp. 60-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229118788454
Protection des personnes LGBT+ en Europe : le cadre juridique national et de l’EU [LGBT+ Protection In Europe: the EU and National Legal Framework]
Howard, E. 2019. Protection des personnes LGBT+ en Europe : le cadre juridique national et de l’EU [LGBT+ Protection In Europe: the EU and National Legal Framework]. Droit et Cultures. 77 (1), pp. 21-37.
Affirmative action in the UK and South Africa
Howard, E. 2018. Affirmative action in the UK and South Africa. in: Baéz, N. and Dominguez-Redondo, E. (ed.) The Existence and Efficacy of Affirmative Action Measures in UK, South Africa, India, China, Latin America and Brazil Jaocaba, Brazil Editora Unoesc. pp. 185-215
Copenhagen: keeping on keeping on. A reply to Mikael Rask Madsen and Jonas Christoffersen on the draft Copenhagen declaration [Blog post]
Leach, P. and Donald, A. 2018. Copenhagen: keeping on keeping on. A reply to Mikael Rask Madsen and Jonas Christoffersen on the draft Copenhagen declaration [Blog post]. EJIL-talk: Blog of the European Journal of International Law.
A wolf in sheep’s clothing: why the draft copenhagen declaration must be rewritten
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2018. A wolf in sheep’s clothing: why the draft copenhagen declaration must be rewritten. EJIL-talk: Blog of the European Journal of International Law.
Introduction
Donald, A., Buckley, C. and Leach, P. 2016. Introduction. in: Buckley, C., Donald, A. and Leach, P. (ed.) Towards Convergence in International Human Rights Law: Approaches of Regional and International Systems Brill | Nijhoff.
Clashing rights? Freedom of religion or belief and equality for LGBT people
Howard, E. 2017. Clashing rights? Freedom of religion or belief and equality for LGBT people. Special Rapporteur on relgion and belief UN.
Religious clothing and symbols in employment. A legal analysis of the situation in the EU member states
Howard, E. and Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers (European Commission) 2017. Religious clothing and symbols in employment. A legal analysis of the situation in the EU member states. Luxembourg European Union. https://doi.org/10.2838/380042
Parliaments as compliance partners in the European Convention on Human Rights system
Donald, A. 2017. Parliaments as compliance partners in the European Convention on Human Rights system. in: Saul, M., Follesdal, A. and Ulfstein, G. (ed.) The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond Cambridge Cambridge University Press. pp. 75-109
Freedom of expression, blasphemy and religious hatred: a view from the United Kingdom
Howard, E. 2017. Freedom of expression, blasphemy and religious hatred: a view from the United Kingdom. in: Temperman, J. and Koltay, A. (ed.) Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression: Comparative, Theoretical and Historical Reflections after the Charlie Hebdo Massacre Cambridge Cambridge University Press. pp. 595-618
Islamic headscarves and the CJEU: Achbita and Bougnaoui
Howard, E. 2017. Islamic headscarves and the CJEU: Achbita and Bougnaoui. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 24 (3), pp. 348-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17722326
Freedom of expression and religious hate speech in Europe
Howard, E. 2017. Freedom of expression and religious hate speech in Europe. UK Routledge.
Gratuitously offensive speech and the political debate
Howard, E. 2016. Gratuitously offensive speech and the political debate. European Human Rights Law Review. 6, pp. 636-644.
Indirect discrimination, reasonable accommodation and religion
Howard, E. 2016. Indirect discrimination, reasonable accommodation and religion. in: Cuypers, D. and Vrielink, J. (ed.) Equal is not enough Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland Intersentia.
A democratic defence of the European Court of Human Rights
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2016. A democratic defence of the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford University Press (OUP).
Freedom of speech versus freedom of religion? The case of Dutch politician Geert Wilders
Howard, E. 2017. Freedom of speech versus freedom of religion? The case of Dutch politician Geert Wilders. Human Rights Law Review. 17 (2), pp. 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngx002
Role of national parliaments
Donald, A. and PluriCourts and the Council of Europe 2014. Role of national parliaments. Conference on the Long-Term Future of the European Court of Human Rights. Oslo 07 - 08 Apr 2014 Council of Europe, PluriCourts. pp. 178-185
The role of parliaments in implementing ECHR standards: overview of existing structures and mechanisms
Donald, A. and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe 2015. The role of parliaments in implementing ECHR standards: overview of existing structures and mechanisms. Strasbourg Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.
Identifying human rights stories: a scoping study
Donald, A. and Mottershaw, E. 2014. Identifying human rights stories: a scoping study. London Middlesex University.
Implementation of the Employment Equality Directive - The principle of non-discrimination on the basis of religion or belief
Howard, E. and European Parliament: Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services 2016. Implementation of the Employment Equality Directive - The principle of non-discrimination on the basis of religion or belief. Brussels European Parliament. https://doi.org/10.2861/783216
Indirect discrimination 15 years on
Howard, E. 2015. Indirect discrimination 15 years on. E Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies. 4 (3).
Parliaments and the European Court of Human Rights
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2016. Parliaments and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford Oxford University Press (OUP).
Religious rights versus sexual orientation discrimination: a fair deal for everyone
Howard, E. 2015. Religious rights versus sexual orientation discrimination: a fair deal for everyone. Religion and Human Rights: an international journal. 10 (2), pp. 128-159. https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12341284
The impact of gendered and racialised identities on the experience of discrimination
Kofman, E., Howard, E., Vacchelli, E. and Wray, H. 2010. The impact of gendered and racialised identities on the experience of discrimination.
Evaluating the impact of selected cases under the Human Rights Act on public services provision
Donald, A., Mottershaw, E., Leach, P. and Watson, J. 2009. Evaluating the impact of selected cases under the Human Rights Act on public services provision. Manchester, UK Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Poverty, inequality and human rights: do human rights make a difference?
Donald, A. and Mottershaw, E. 2009. Poverty, inequality and human rights: do human rights make a difference? Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Developing a Bill of Rights for the UK
Donald, A. 2010. Developing a Bill of Rights for the UK. Manchester, UK Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Religion or belief, equality and human rights in England and Wales
Donald, A. 2012. Religion or belief, equality and human rights in England and Wales. Manchester, UK Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Debating social rights [Book review]
Donald, A. 2012. Debating social rights [Book review]. Public Law. 2012 (Apr), pp. 370-374.
Opinion: a Bill of Rights for the UK? Why the process matters
Donald, A. 2010. Opinion: a Bill of Rights for the UK? Why the process matters. European Human Rights Law Review. 5, pp. 459-464.
Religion or belief in the workplace and service delivery: findings from a call for evidence
Mitchell, M., Beninger, K., Donald, A., Howard, E. and NatCen Social Research 2015. Religion or belief in the workplace and service delivery: findings from a call for evidence. Equality and Human Rights Commission.
The protection of religious minorities in Europe: strengths and weaknesses
Howard, E. 2015. The protection of religious minorities in Europe: strengths and weaknesses. in: Ippolito, F. and Iglesias Sanchez, S. (ed.) Protecting Vulnerable Groups: The Human Rights Framework Hart Publishing. pp. 181-200
The implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights against the UK: unravelling the paradox
Donald, A. 2015. The implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights against the UK: unravelling the paradox. in: Ziegler, K., Wicks, E. and Hodson, L. (ed.) The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship? Oxford Hart. pp. 135-162
The role of parliaments following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Donald, A. and Leach, P. 2015. The role of parliaments following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. in: Hunt, M., Hooper, H. and Yowell, P. (ed.) Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit Oxford Hart. pp. 59-92
S.A.S. v France: living together or increased social division?
Howard, E. 2014. S.A.S. v France: living together or increased social division? EJIL-talk: Blog of the European Journal of International Law.
Banning niqabs in public spaces
Howard, E. 2013. Banning niqabs in public spaces. EJIL-talk: Blog of the European Journal of International Law.
The European Court of Human Rights gets it right: a comment on Eweida and others v the United Kingdom
Howard, E. 2013. The European Court of Human Rights gets it right: a comment on Eweida and others v the United Kingdom. EJIL:Talk!.
Protecting freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief: Strasbourg or Luxembourg?
Howard, E. 2014. Protecting freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief: Strasbourg or Luxembourg? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. 32 (2), pp. 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411403200204
Islamic veil bans: the gender equality justification and empirical evidence
Howard, E. 2014. Islamic veil bans: the gender equality justification and empirical evidence. in: Brems, E. (ed.) The experiences of face veil wearers in Europe and the law Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. pp. 206-217
The implementation and impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 in the UK
Donald, A. 2014. The implementation and impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 in the UK. PhD thesis Middlesex University School of Law
Equality bodies and individual victims: an example of good practice from the Netherlands
Howard, E. 2012. Equality bodies and individual victims: an example of good practice from the Netherlands. E Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies. 1 (1-2).
The UK and the European Court of Human Rights
Donald, A., Gordon, J. and Leach, P. 2012. The UK and the European Court of Human Rights. Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Reasonable accommodation of religion and other discrimination grounds in EU law
Howard, E. 2013. Reasonable accommodation of religion and other discrimination grounds in EU law. European Law Review.
Banning Islamic veils: is gender equality a valid argument?
Howard, E. 2012. Banning Islamic veils: is gender equality a valid argument? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 12 (3), pp. 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229112464450
A Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom? Lessons from overseas
Donald, A. 2013. A Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom? Lessons from overseas. in: Masterman, R. and Leigh, I. (ed.) The United Kingdom's statutory Bill of Rights: constitutional and comparative perspectives Oxford, UK Oxford University Press (OUP).
Advancing debate about religion or belief, equality and human rights: grounds for optimism?
Donald, A. 2013. Advancing debate about religion or belief, equality and human rights: grounds for optimism? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. 2 (1), pp. 50-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwt002
Limits and achievements of the Human Rights Act from the socio-economic point of view: the HRA, poverty and social exclusion
Donald, A. and Mottershaw, E. 2012. Limits and achievements of the Human Rights Act from the socio-economic point of view: the HRA, poverty and social exclusion. in: Kang-Riou, N., Milner, J. and Nayak, S. (ed.) Confronting the Human Rights Act: Contemporary Themes and Perspectives London and New York Routledge. pp. 141-158
Law and the wearing of religious symbols: European bans on the wearing of religious symbols in education
Howard, E. 2012. Law and the wearing of religious symbols: European bans on the wearing of religious symbols in education. London Routledge.
Case Comment. An opportunity missed? Comment on Romer
Howard, E. 2011. Case Comment. An opportunity missed? Comment on Romer. European Law Review. 36 (4), pp. 589-599.
Multiple discrimination in law.
Howard, E. 2011. Multiple discrimination in law. Think Equal - Symposium on Multiple Discrimination. National Commission for the Promotion of Equality (NCPE), Malta 01 Nov 2011
Bans on the wearing of religious symbols in British Schools: a violation of the right to non-discrimination?
Howard, E. 2011. Bans on the wearing of religious symbols in British Schools: a violation of the right to non-discrimination? Religion and Human Rights. 6 (2), pp. 127-149.
EU Equality Law: three recent developments
Howard, E. 2011. EU Equality Law: three recent developments. European Law Journal. 17 (6), pp. 785-803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00578.x
Gendered experiences of racial discrimination: comparative socio-legal research
Carles, I., Howard, E. and Kofman, E. 2011. Gendered experiences of racial discrimination: comparative socio-legal research. in: Schiek, D. and Lawson, A. (ed.) European Union Non-Discrimination Law and Intersectionality: investigating the triangle of racial, gender and disability discrimination Ashgate.
ECJ advances equality in Europe by giving horizontal direct effect to directives
Howard, E. 2011. ECJ advances equality in Europe by giving horizontal direct effect to directives. European Public Law. 17 (4), pp. 729-743. https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2011046
The EU race directive: developing the protection against racial discrimination within the EU.
Howard, E. 2009. The EU race directive: developing the protection against racial discrimination within the EU. London Routledge.
Equality: a fundamental right in the EU?
Howard, E. 2009. Equality: a fundamental right in the EU? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 10 (1), pp. 19-38.
School bans on the wearing of religious symbols: examining the implications of recent case law from the UK.
Howard, E. 2009. School bans on the wearing of religious symbols: examining the implications of recent case law from the UK. Religion and Human Rights: an international journal. 4 (1), pp. 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1163/187103209X440182
Evaluating the impact of human rights litigation on policy and practice: a case study of the UK
Donald, A. and Mottershaw, E. 2009. Evaluating the impact of human rights litigation on policy and practice: a case study of the UK. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 1 (3), pp. 339-361. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hup019
The European year of equal opportunities for all, 2007: is the EU moving away from a formal idea of equality?
Howard, E. 2007. The European year of equal opportunities for all, 2007: is the EU moving away from a formal idea of equality? European Law Journal. 14 (2), pp. 168-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00409.x
Race and racism: why does European law have difficulties with definitions?
Howard, E. 2008. Race and racism: why does European law have difficulties with definitions? The international journal of comparative labour law and industrial relations. 24 (1), pp. 1-30.
The European agency for fundamental rights
Howard, E. 2006. The European agency for fundamental rights. European Human Rights Law Review. 4, pp. 445-455.
Anti race discrimination measures in Europe: an attack on two fronts
Howard, E. 2005. Anti race discrimination measures in Europe: an attack on two fronts. European Law Journal. 11 (4), pp. 468-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00271.x
The EU race directive: time for change?
Howard, E. 2007. The EU race directive: time for change? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 8 (4), pp. 237-261.
The case for a considered hierarchy of discrimination grounds in EU law.
Howard, E. 2007. The case for a considered hierarchy of discrimination grounds in EU law. Maastrict Journal of European and Comparative Law. 13 (4), pp. 445-470.
The EU race directive: its symbolic value - its only value?
Howard, E. 2004. The EU race directive: its symbolic value - its only value? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 6 (2), pp. 141-163.