Algorithmic opacity: making algorithmic processes transparent through abstraction hierarchy

Article


Paudyal, P. and Wong, B. 2018. Algorithmic opacity: making algorithmic processes transparent through abstraction hierarchy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 62 (1), pp. 192-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621046
TypeArticle
TitleAlgorithmic opacity: making algorithmic processes transparent through abstraction hierarchy
AuthorsPaudyal, P. and Wong, B.
Abstract

In this paper we introduce the problem of algorithmic opacity and the challenges it presents to ethical decision-making in criminal intelligence analysis. Machine learning algorithms have played important roles in the decision-making process over the past decades. Intelligence analysts are increasingly being presented with smart black box automation that use machine learning algorithms to find patterns or interesting and unusual occurrences in big data sets. Algorithmic opacity is the lack visibility of computational processes such that humans are not able to inspect its inner workings to ascertain for themselves how the results and conclusions were computed. This is a problem that leads to several ethical issues. In the VALCRI project, we developed an abstraction hierarchy and abstraction decomposition space to identify important functional relationships and system invariants in relation to ethical goals. Such explanatory relationships can be valuable for making algorithmic process transparent during the criminal intelligence analysis process.

PublisherSAGE Publications
JournalProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
ISSN2169-5067
Electronic1071-1813
Publication dates
Online25 Sep 2018
Print01 Sep 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited08 Oct 2018
Accepted04 Apr 2018
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
Copyright Statement

Pragya Paudyal and B.L. William Wong, Algorithmic Opacity: Making Algorithmic Processes Transparent through Abstraction Hierarchy, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol 62, Issue 1) pp. 192 - 196. Copyright © 2018 (Human Factors and Ergonomics Society). Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621046
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/87z33

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
  • 14
    total views
  • 22
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 3
    downloads this month

Export as