A multimodal investigation of learner attention and cognitive load in linear and non-linear educational content
Article
Mistry, K., Dafoulas, G., Nalli, G., Aria, F.T., Langari, B. and Tsiakara, A. 2026. A multimodal investigation of learner attention and cognitive load in linear and non-linear educational content. E-Learning Innovations Journal. 4 (2), pp. 25-47. https://doi.org/10.57125/elij.2026.09.25.02
| Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Title | A multimodal investigation of learner attention and cognitive load in linear and non-linear educational content |
| Authors | Mistry, K., Dafoulas, G., Nalli, G., Aria, F.T., Langari, B. and Tsiakara, A. |
| Abstract | The measurement of real-time cognitive load remains challenging in e-learning environments, while self-report measures provide limited insight into learners' moment-to-moment cognitive responses. This study examines whether combining eye-tracking and physiological monitoring can provide such an objective account across different instructional content formats. A Tobii Pro Fusion eye tracker and Polar heart rate sensor were used in a within-subjects study where 52 participants engaged with four types of educational content: text-heavy linear, text-heavy non-linear, graph-heavy linear, and graph-heavy non-linear. Based on gaze patterns, heat maps, and heart rate data, two main reading strategies emerged: F-pattern readers (n = 23, 44%) and Z-pattern readers (n = 29, 56%). Graph-heavy content was associated with longer completion times and higher physiological markers of cognitive effort. Heart rate increases of more than 30% over individual baseline were consistently associated with periods of higher cognitive strain, suggesting a possible threshold for adaptive instructional intervention. Mean heart rate rose from 92.08 bpm for text-heavy linear material to 122.75 bpm for graph-heavy non-linear content, indicating greater physiological engagement as instructional complexity increased. Although these results suggest practical directions for adaptive e-learning systems, learning analytics dashboards, and content delivery in LMS platforms like Moodle, Blackboard, and Canvas, they are a foundation rather than definitive design rules because this was an exploratory, descriptive study. Based on this, three outputs are proposed: a real-time intervention protocol framework, a personalisation model based on objective learner profiling, and evidence-based content creation guidelines. |
| Keywords | adaptive learning; cognitive load; digital learning environments; e-learning design; eye-tracking; multimodal learning analytics; physiological sensing |
| Sustainable Development Goals | 4 Quality education |
| 9 Industry, innovation and infrastructure | |
| Middlesex University Theme | Creativity, Culture & Enterprise |
| Publisher | Futurity Research Publishing |
| Journal | E-Learning Innovations Journal |
| ISSN | |
| Electronic | 2957-2207 |
| Publication dates | |
| Online | 25 Sep 2026 |
| 25 Sep 2026 | |
| Publication process dates | |
| Submitted | 14 Apr 2026 |
| Accepted | 28 Aug 2026 |
| Deposited | 06 Oct 2026 |
| Output status | Published |
| Publisher's version | License File Access Level Open |
| Copyright Statement | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.57125/elij.2026.09.25.02 |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/36v38q
Download files
Publisher's version
| ELIJ_Mistry,+K.,+Dafoulas,+G.,+Nalli,+G.,+Aria,+F.+T.,+Langari,+B._Tsiakara,+A.+.pdf | ||
| License: CC BY 4.0 | ||
| File access level: Open | ||
7
total views0
total downloads7
views this month0
downloads this month