Validity and reliability of the FlightScope Mevo+ launch monitor for assessing golf performance
Article
Brennan, A., Murray, A., Coughlan, D., Mountjoy, M., Wells, J., Ehlert, A., Xu, J., Broadie, M., Turner, A. and Bishop, C. 2024. Validity and reliability of the FlightScope Mevo+ launch monitor for assessing golf performance. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 38 (4), pp. e174-e181. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000004685
| Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Title | Validity and reliability of the FlightScope Mevo+ launch monitor for assessing golf performance |
| Authors | Brennan, A., Murray, A., Coughlan, D., Mountjoy, M., Wells, J., Ehlert, A., Xu, J., Broadie, M., Turner, A. and Bishop, C. |
| Abstract | The purpose of this study was to (a) assess the validity of the FlightScope Mevo+ against the TrackMan 4 and (b) determine the within-session reliability of both launch monitor systems when using a driver and a 6-iron. Twenty-nine youth golfers, with a minimum of 3 years of playing experience, volunteered for this study. All golfers completed 10 shots with a 6-iron and a driver, with 8 metrics concurrently monitored from both launch monitor systems in an indoor biomechanics laboratory. For both clubs, Pearson's r values ranged from small to near perfect (r range = 0.254–0.985), with the strongest relationships evident for clubhead speed (CHS) and ball speed (r ≥ 0.92). Bland-Altman plots showed almost perfect levels of agreement between devices for smash factor (mean bias ≤−0.016; 95% CI: −0.112, 0.079), whereas the poorest levels of agreement was for spin rate (mean bias ≤1,238; 95% CI: −2,628, 5,103). From a reliability standpoint, the TrackMan showed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.60–0.99) and coefficient of variation (CV) values ranged from good to poor (CV = 1.31–230.22%). For the Mevo+ device, ICC data ranged from poor to excellent (ICC = −0.22 to 0.99) and CV values ranged from good to poor (CV = 1.46–72.70%). Importantly, both devices showed similar trends, with the strongest reliability consistently evident for CHS, ball speed, carry distance, and smash factor. Finally, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were evident between devices for spin rate (driver: d = 1.27; 6-iron: d = 0.90), launch angle (driver: d = 0.54), and attack angle (driver: d = −0.51). Collectively, these findings suggest that the FlightScope Mevo+ launch monitor is both valid and reliable when monitoring CHS, ball speed, carry distance, and smash factor. However, additional variables such as spin rate, launch angle, attack angle, and spin axis exhibit substantially greater variation compared with the TrackMan 4, suggesting that practitioners may wish to be cautious when providing golfers with feedback relating to these metrics. |
| Sustainable Development Goals | 3 Good health and well-being |
| Middlesex University Theme | Health & Wellbeing |
| Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
| Journal | The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research |
| ISSN | 1064-8011 |
| Electronic | 1533-4287 |
| Publication dates | |
| Online | 13 Dec 2023 |
| Apr 2024 | |
| Publication process dates | |
| Accepted | 21 Dec 2023 |
| Deposited | 23 Sep 2025 |
| Output status | Published |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000004685 |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/2q532x
184
total views0
total downloads6
views this month0
downloads this month